Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. The Galaxy A50 is an way older phone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung could make it just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has improved battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.