Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy A51 5G is notably older and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's body is still a bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better performing processor than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little lower screen density, they both have a same size display.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, a lesser megapixels back facing camera and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.