Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is much better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with a 91.1 score against 79.9. Galaxy A52s is a a bit lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but they are equally thin. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per inch of display, they both have a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy A52s and Galaxy A25 5G have extremely similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, they have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.