Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Galaxy A25 5G's overall score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a noticeably older and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung was able to build it thinner anyway. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a better storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier sensor offering a lower image quality, slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.