Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a better phone than Galaxy A25 5G, we must tell that it is also a much older, thicker and just a little bit heavier phone.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy M51 also has a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.