Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Galaxy A25 5G, with a global score of 90.8 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it is a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy Note 20 features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A25 5G captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a much tinier sensor shooting much worse quality photos, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.