Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a 98.9 score against 79.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is a little thinner than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it's just a little heavier and was released many years before. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.