Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Galaxy Note 3's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it's lighter.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a little lower pixel density, a little lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a quite smaller screen.
Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low-light environments, a larger back camera sensor and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.