Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Despite being the best device in this comparison, the Galaxy Note10 Lite is a incredibly older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 6 GB RAM. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a bit more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, a smaller aperture and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.