Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. The Galaxy A25 5G body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it is heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little greater pixel density and a little bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G features much more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.