Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having an 80.2 score against 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note5 is a lot older than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a much greater performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little worse display pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.