Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy Note7, having a 79.9 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than Galaxy Note7. Galaxy Note7 has a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 4 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little lower screen pixels density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Galaxy A25 5G features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.