Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting a 93.6 score against 79.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is incredibly older and just a bit heavier than Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still a bit thinner. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A25 5G has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a worse image quality, slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.