Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Galaxy S10 Lite is an extremely older cellphone than the Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung made it just a bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. Galaxy S10 Lite has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower video resolution, a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and video and a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.