Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also an older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker phone. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a really brighter screen and a better pixels density. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A25 5G.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.