Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. The Galaxy A25 5G design is incredibly newer and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's just a bit heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has way less brightness and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.