Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy S9 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S9 has just a bit better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G has a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A25 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has worse video frame rates, a tinier aperture and a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.