Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, with a overall score of 79.9 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a notably newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but it is somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of display. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A25 5G also has more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.