Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also a older, heavier and extremely thicker phone. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.