Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with an 81 score against 79.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it must be told that it is also a much older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bigger display.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
The Galaxy A25 5G features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.