Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older device than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it is thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little bit lower screen density and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much better 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Galaxy A25 5G has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.