Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Galaxy A25 5G, with a 92.3 score against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, although it was released many years before. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite smaller screen and a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.