Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 global score. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably older and extremely heavier than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still thinner.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much smaller back camera sensor shooting way worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.