Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia 5 II is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, having an 87.2 score against 79.9. The Xperia 5 II construction is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it was released 3 years before. Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better screen than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia 5 II, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Xperia 5 II has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia 5 II also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with longer battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor providing a much worse image quality, a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.