Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a 79.9 score against 79. Even though the Galaxy A25 5G is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and also newer. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, a lot smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.