Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is slightly better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 86.6 against 79.9. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than Galaxy A25 5G, it must be noted that it's also a lot older, heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a way bigger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and higher video frame rate.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.