Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Although it's the best we are comparing, Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is a older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier phone than Galaxy A25 5G. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with more screen brightness, a little bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse 48 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.