Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 93.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Alpine white and Solstice grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 13.86 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a global score of 93.1, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro is a better phone than Galaxy A25 5G, it must be noted that it's also a older, a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a quite more display brightness.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a lot better video quality, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.