Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a score of 90, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro body is extremely older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a little better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a very superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A25 5G and the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro both feature quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.