Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A25 5G, having a 90.7 score against 79.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it's somewhat heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher display density, a way brighter display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G and the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra count with really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.