Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a score of 81.4, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is an way older device than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, but it's somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version, offering a couple nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much brighter display and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera and a worse (4K) video quality, and they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a lot larger sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.