Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T has an overall score of 82.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi 9T is much older and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi 9T has 10 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. They have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little worse pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bigger screen and much more brightness.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower resolution back camera and a worse video resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.