Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Despite of the fact Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is much older and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still just a little bit lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with way more brightness and a little bigger display.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.