Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A2's general score of 78. Even though Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is notably newer than Xiaomi Mi A2, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi A2 has a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G. They have 8 cores and 6 GB of RAM. Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a camera with much more megapixels and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.