Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-12-11 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3's overall score of 79.2. Galaxy A25 5G is a heavier device than the Xiaomi Mi A3, but they are 0.33inches thick. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better screen density, a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Xiaomi Mi A3 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a bigger camera sensor. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.