Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 9.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a 79.9 score against 77.5. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Galaxy A25 5G has a much better display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a just a bit greater display pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also has a bigger sensor, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a little better battery life than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a 5300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.