Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 79.9. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is noticeably older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little lighter. The Galaxy A25 5G features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.