Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with an 83.8 score against 79.9. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A25 5G, but it's a little heavier. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a little lower display density, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with way more brightness and a bit bigger display. Galaxy A25 5G has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.