Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2023-12-11 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's global score of 76. Both phones in this comparison use Android operating system, but Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Galaxy A25 5G construction is a lot newer, but a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than Xiaomi Mi Note 2.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little greater count of pixels in each inch of display and a little higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less processing cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 23 percent more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.