Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T, with a general score of 79.9 against 78.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a extremely newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi 9T.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. They have a same size screen, the same 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a greater pixels amount per inch of display. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a way tinier sensor, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a more MP camera. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.