Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Despite of the fact that the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is way older than Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a quite more display brightness and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro count with similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.