Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-12-11 | -- |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having a 79.9 score against 77.1. The Galaxy A25 5G is a a little bit thicker but just a little lighter device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a little bit better display than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400, a little larger screen, a quite greater number of pixels per inch of display and a bit brighter screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy A25 5G one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB, the Galaxy A25 5G also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Galaxy A25 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.