Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2023-12-11 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.11 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 general score. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but they have the same thickness. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has an older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a much brighter display, a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G has much more storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution, a larger diafragm aperture and a way better (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has greater battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.