Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 global score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G is a incredibly newer device, and it is also just a little thinner and a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a much faster CPU than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. Both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, a better number of pixels per display inch and a display of the same size.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a way smaller sensor offering a lot lower image quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a more MP back camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a battery life that is just as good as Galaxy A25 5G's battery duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.