Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 general score. Despite being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker device than the Galaxy A25 5G. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number in each inch of screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G. Both have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Galaxy A25 5G feature incredibly similar battery performance, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.