Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-12-11 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.11 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a global score of 79.9, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A25 5G has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11. The Galaxy A25 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A25 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a lesser mega pixels camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A25 5G, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.