Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| -- | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has a score of 88.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25's overall score of 74.3. Apple iPhone X's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25. IPhone X has a much better performance than Galaxy A25, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory and less cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A25, because although it has much less brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a little bit greater pixels amount per inch in the screen. Galaxy A25 has a greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone X, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The iPhone X has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A25 counts with a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.