Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Galaxy A25, with a overall score of 84.2 against 74.3. Apple iPhone XS's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A25. IPhone XS counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and much lower brightness, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels in each display inch and a quite better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone XS features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A25, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone XS counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A25, although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size camera aperture.
The Galaxy A25 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 features a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.