Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25's global score of 74.3. LG Velvet's body is a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A25. Galaxy A25 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount per screen inch.
LG Velvet has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A25. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A25, although it has a lesser MP resolution camera in the back, they both have a F1.8 aperture. LG Velvet features a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A25 features better battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.