Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a general score of 86.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A25's general score of 74.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 has Android 14. Even being the best in this comparison, Moto G200 5G's construction is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A25.
Galaxy A25 features a little bit better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A25 has much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A25 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A25 and the Motorola Moto G200 5G have similar batteries duration.
Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A25, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.